SAT Math
SAT inequalities: solve ranges and test feasible points
Solve SAT inequalities, reverse the sign correctly, interpret strict boundaries, and check compound or two-variable constraints.
Solve an inequality using the same operations as an equation, reversing its direction only when multiplying or dividing by a negative quantity. Then test a value in the proposed range and honor any whole-number or boundary restrictions.
Reverse the sign for a negative multiplier
For , subtract 4 and divide by 3 to obtain . Neither operation reverses the inequality because 3 is positive.
For , subtract 7 to get . Dividing by reverses the direction, giving . Test : the original left side is 17, which is at least 15. Test : the left side is 7, so it fails.
The reason for reversing is order. Although , multiplying both numbers by gives . Adding or subtracting a negative number does not reverse an inequality; multiplication or division by a negative does.
If a multiplier contains an unknown variable, you cannot assume its sign. Split into cases or use a method that avoids multiplying by an expression whose sign you do not know.
Keep strict and inclusive boundaries distinct
The symbols and exclude the boundary value. The symbols and include it. On a number line, an open point excludes the endpoint and a filled point includes it.
If , the real-number solutions approach 5 but do not include it, so there is no greatest real solution. If the prompt restricts to integers, the greatest allowed integer is 4. This restriction changes the answer; do not assume it merely because the choices are whole numbers.
For , the boundary value is included. Check the exact language in word problems: "at most" means inclusive, while "less than" is strict. "At least" gives a lower inclusive boundary.
Linear Inequalities · Easy
Choose an answer.
Solve a compound condition as written
For , subtract 5 from all three parts: . Divide all parts by 3 to get . The lower endpoint is excluded and the upper endpoint included.
An "and" condition requires both inequalities. If and , the solution is . An "or" condition allows either one. If or , the solution consists of two separated ranges.
Test the boundaries and one interior value. For , fails, works, and works. Those checks catch a flipped endpoint or an accidental change from strict to inclusive.
Translate a budget or capacity into a constraint
Suppose a club has $50 for supplies, pays a fixed $8 shipping charge, and buys notebooks at $6 each. With notebooks, the budget condition is . Solving gives .
Because notebooks are counted, must be a nonnegative integer. Seven notebooks cost $50; eight cost $56 and exceed the budget. If the budget were $49, the algebra would give , so the greatest whole-number count would be 6, not a rounded 7.
Write the fixed cost separately from the per-item cost. "At most $50" permits spending exactly $50. "Under $50" would exclude it. The interpretation of the inequality is part of the solution.
For two variables, test both inequalities
A system describes the overlap of its constraints. Consider and . The point satisfies both: and . The point satisfies the first at equality, but fails the second because is false.
For a graph, a strict inequality has an excluded boundary, shown as a dashed line; an inclusive inequality has an included boundary, shown as a solid line. Desmos can graph the inequalities and show the overlapping region. If a point appears close to a boundary, substitute its coordinates to settle the result exactly.
One feasible point does not establish that an entire region is feasible. A boundary intersection also needs both inclusion checks. If one condition is strict at that intersection, the intersection itself is excluded.
Avoid using a linear rule on every expression
For a quadratic inequality, first find the roots and determine where the expression is positive or negative. In , the product is negative between the roots, so . It is positive outside that interval. The strict symbol excludes both roots.
For an absolute-value inequality, think in terms of distance. means lies within 3 units of 2, so . An inequality asking for a distance greater than 3 gives outside ranges instead. Do not remove absolute-value bars without considering both directions.
Finish with a range and a check
State the full range, identify any endpoint restrictions, and test a value in the original inequality. For a multiple-choice feasible-point question, direct substitution may be shorter than graphing every boundary.
Practice inequalities in the SAT question bank, then compare linear equations and systems of equations. Keep your review specific: negative division, endpoint inclusion, "and" versus "or," or a context restriction. Those labels tell you what to check on the next problem.
Try it yourself
Choose an answer.
Sources
Luke Finigan is a student developer and the creator of 1600.now, a free Digital SAT practice platform. About Luke.

